Saturday 29 October 2011

Westwood College Literacy Policy (from my last job!)

Rationale

Language is the principal medium for learning. By improving their literacy, students become better learners. Developing a whole-college approach to literacy provides an excellent opportunity to create a real learning ethos.

Good literacy skills are a key factor in raising standards across all subjects. All teachers are teachers of literacy.

Literacy is the most important set of skills for young people to develop. Reading, Writing and Oracy are the skills which matter most to employers.


Aims

  • To boost attainment in all subject areas through building students’ confidence in their oracy, reading and writing;

  • To raise attainment by including parents in the promotion of literacy1 (eg through TALMOS);

  • To raise attainment across the Pyramid through liaison with feeder schools2, Library Services, SSAT etc.

  • To improve students’ life chances through the promotion of reading for pleasure;

  • To improve students’ writing through the use of the sequence for teaching writing;

  • To improve students’ understanding of how to progress in writing through improved consistency in the annotation of work across the curriculum;

  • For departments to plan and deliver excellent speaking and listening for learning;

  • For departments to explicitly identify literacy objectives in their curriculum planning;

  • To improve the performance of boys through addressing their specific Literacy needs. Boys need:

    • time to talk before writing;

    • a real purpose and audience for writing tasks;

    • modelling, scaffolding, writing frames and other techniques to support writing;

    • DARTs (Directed Activities Related to Text);

    • little or no dictation and copying;

    • use of grids and other graphic aids;

    • explicit teaching of planning, note-taking etc.;

    • emphasis on good presentation (including handwriting);

    • clear objectives;

    • clear short-term goals;

    • well-paced lessons;

    • seating plans which disrupt the anti-academic boy culture;

    • to know that you are on their case;

    • challenge and competition;

    • plenaries to aid reflective thinking.


Links to Assessment Policy


  • Improved Literacy skills will help students engage with the Assessment for Learning approach;

  • Good Literacy encourages reflection and will support students in taking responsibility for their learning;

  • Good oracy (eg. coaching skills) is particularly helpful in peer assessment;

  • Improved Literacy skills will help students understand learning objectives and assessment criteria;

  • Good Literacy skills enable students to negotiate their own targets and evaluate their own work;

  • Through our shared focus on literacy we will improve our feedback to students, helping them to improve.


Reading


Westwood is a “Reading Connects” College.

Reading for pleasure is key to academic success and future life chances.

At Westwood, we encourage all students to read for pleasure and share their enthusiasm with others.

The key principles of our attitude to reading are:

  • Students choose what they want to read;

  • Students discover, and share, the kind of reading material they prefer;

  • There is no judgement passed about supposed worthiness of reading choices;

  • We have good resources in place and attractive environments within which to read them;

  • All staff share their enthusiasm for reading with students;

  • We help parents to encourage their young people to read3.



Writing

  • Writing tasks should have a real purpose and audience;

  • Staff use the sequence for teaching to help students approach writing tasks;

  • Staff use a range of strategies to help students structure their writing (eg. modelling, scaffolding, writing frames);

  • Staff build on students’ prior knowledge of “text types” helping them to know what style, register, grammar and vocabulary will be appropriate to the task being undertaken4;

  • Staff stress the importance of paragraphing in structuring work effectively, teaching a range of ways to link paragraphs;

  • Staff teach students how to use complex sentences in order to make their writing effective;

  • All staff emphasise the need for accurate punctuation5;

  • Staff emphasise the need for accurate spelling and explicitly teach the spelling of subject specific vocabulary6;

  • Staff understand the importance of clear handwriting for examination success and insist on high standards of presentation;

  • Drafting of work is used as a way of producing excellent pieces of work, especially where these are externally assessed;

  • Annotation of literacy aspects of students’ work should be consistent across all departments.


Reflective Writing (learning journals will be piloted with Y12 in 2007-2008)


  • Learning Journals help students appreciate and take responsibility for their learning;

  • Students will be given regular opportunities to write reflectively about their learning;

  • Working with Learning Journals makes students more engaged in their learning;

  • Learning Journals help students to become more independent learners;

  • Learning Journals help students to build metacognitive skills (eg. reflection).


Oracy


  • Students are encouraged to see talk as a key tool for learning;

  • Students are given opportunities to speak at length in order to “talk their way into understanding”;

  • We promote “student voice” by giving all students opportunities to speak;

  • All students should be listened to frequently in order to improve motivation and self-esteem;

  • All students have regular opportunities to engage in pair work, group activities and teacher-pupil talk.

  • Students have frequent opportunities to use talk to explore, create, question and revise ideas;

  • Students develop the clarity and confidence to convey a point of view or information in a varied repertoire of styles;

  • Talk in lesson is “dialogic” in order to promote learning;

  • Dialogic talk is collective, reciprocal, cumulative and supportive;

  • Staff regularly reflect on their own questioning practice;

  • Westwood’s teachers develop systems to ensure that all students participate in oracy activities;

  • Staff make use of seating plans to promote student participation and engagement;

  • Staff use plenaries frequently to encourage reflective talk and to reinforce links between the students’ learning and the assessment objectives.

1 Led by the English Department. More details below.

2 Literacy co-ordinator will liaise with feeder schools and set up paired reading and writing visits.

3 Led by the English Department. Eg. Through use of reading recommendations (which are sent home), reading logs and the discussion of reading for pleasure as a key component of parent-teacher meetings.

4 Led by the English Department through an introductory “text types” unit in Y9.

5 INSET by Literacy Co-ordinator will be planned to share good practice around these aspects of teaching writing.

6 Led by English Department. Each student will be given a personal “vocabulary book”. All departments should use this to help students record correct spellings and meanings of subject specific vocabulary as well as to reinforce correct spellings of problem words.

What Works with Boys (notes based on my reading)

  1. you decide who sits where (challenge the culture)

  2. variety in each lesson and over the course

  3. increased access to ICT and media work

  4. incorporating oral and drama work

  5. explaining the point of the lesson at the beginning

  6. plenaries / reflection

  7. small steps

  8. short-term achievable goals

  9. clear guidelines to improve work

  10. clear instructions at each stage

  11. varying groups for different tasks

  12. meta-cognition – BLP learning muscles

  13. topics wild not tame

  14. let them know you are on their case”

  15. challenge

  16. competition


Literacy Specific


  1. real purpose and audience for writing

  2. talk it through before writing

  3. teach planning, extended writing, note-taking, research

  4. help in structuring writing – scaffolding, modelling, writing frames

  5. emphasise presentation and handwriting

  6. clear use of first drafts and “neat” final drafts

  7. relevance and variety of texts

Active Listening

Listen for:


The three most important things.

Three practical applications for this information.

What would you teach to a Martian?

How might you apply this information in your own life?

Three things you didn’t know before.

How might this information have helped someone living 100 years ago?

What evidence of the application of this idea is there in the outside world?

What are the essential key words to know?


"The Seven Habits Of Highly Effective People" Stephen R. Covey

  1. Be proactive.

  2. Begin with the end in mind.

  3. Put first things first.

  4. Think win/win.

  5. Seek first to understand then to be understood.

  6. Synergise.

  7. Sharpen the saw.


Reframing the Parent-Teacher Conference (Schools That Learn, p. 223)

Try these questions:
  • What strengths do you see in your child?

  • What does your child say about school?

  • What kinds of activities, at school or elsewhere, seem to frustrate your child most?

  • What kinds of activities excite your child? What does he/she play?

  • What goals do you have for your child?

  • What goals does your child have?

  • What is your child’s favourite subject or activity?

  • What would you like me to know about your child?


Query - what’s the appropriateness of these:

  • Tell me about your child’s peers and social relations? Who does he or she socialize with outside of school?

  • What kinds of responsibilities does you child have at home?

Notes from "The Fifth Discipline" (Peter Senge)

  1. Personal Mastery: cultivating individual aspiration and awareness; drawing forth personal vision.

  2. Mental Models: becoming aware of the sources of our thinking.

  3. Shared Vision: fostering commitment to common purpose.

  4. Team Learning: transforming our skills of collective thinking.

  5. Systems Thinking: developing awareness of complexity, interdependencies, change, and leverage.

Learning: notes for parents

Useful book: “Help Your Child to Succeed” Bill Lucas and Alistair Smith (although aimed at parents of younger children).


Some key points:

  • pracise goal-setting;

  • share your own aspirations with children;

  • encourage talk about feelings;

  • share your own enthusiasms with children and take an interest in theirs;

  • mistakes are okay;

  • break down challenging tasks into chunks;

  • find out about coaching;

  • make a regular time for learning together;


Five Secrets

    1. Be positive;

    2. Use planning and goal-setting;

    3. Make connections with what your child already knows;

    4. Help your child learn by seeing, hearing and doing;

    5. Review.


3 Ps (ways to promote learning)

      • Positive

      • Persitent

      • Problem-solving


Other Ideas


  • more info on intranet about our curriculum;

  • podcasts?

Intelligence (John Holt)

Intelligence



The intelligent person, young or old, meeting a new situation or problem, opens herself up to it; she tries to take in with mind and senses everything she can about it; she thinks about it instead of about herself or what it might cause to happen to her; she grapples with it boldly, imaginatively, resourcefully, and if not confidently, at least hopefully; if she fails to master it, she looks without shame or fear at her mistakes and learns what she can from them. This is intelligence. Clearly its roots lie in a certain feeling about life, and one’s self with respect to life. Just as clearly, unintelligence is not what most psychologists seem to suppose, the same thing as intelligence only less of it. It is an entirely different style of behaviour, arising out of an entirely different set of attitudes.

John Holt: How Children Fail


Dale Carnegie's principles (Notes from "How to Win Friends ...")

Handling People.

Don't criticize, condemn or complain.

Give honest and sincere approbation.

Arouse in the other person an eager want.


Make People Like You.

Become genuinely interested in people.

Smile.

Remember that a person's name is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language.

Be a good listener. Encourage others to talk about themselves.

Talk in terms of the other person's interests.

Make the other person feel important - and do it sincerely.


Win Them to Your Way of Thinking.

The only way to get the best of an argument is to avoid it.

Show respect for other people's opinions. Never say, "You're wrong."

If you are wrong, admit is quickly and emphatically.

Begin in a friendly way.

Get the other person saying "yes, yes" immediately.

Let the other person do a great deal of the talking.

Let the other person feel that the idea is his or hers.

Try honestly to see things from the other person's point of view.

Be sympathetic with the other person's ideas and desires.

Appeal to the nobler motives.

Dramatize your ideas.

Throw down a challenge.


Leadership.

Begin with praise and honest appreciation.

Call attention to people's mistakes indirectly.

Talk about your own mistakes before criticising the other person.

Ask questions instead of giving direct orders.

Let the other person save face.

Praise the slightest improvement and praise every improvement. Be hearty in your approbation and lavish in your praise.

Give the other person a fine reputation to live up to.

Use encouragement. Make the fault seem easy to correct.

Make the other person happy about doing the thing you suggest.

Questioning Strategies (Notes from my reading)

Knowledge
tell which 3 things are the most important?
recite describe them to someone else
list key characters ...
memorise
remember
find
summarise in your own words
locate where in the book would you find?
name poetic techniques ... ?

Comprehension
restate what’s happening?
explain what is significant?
give examples of
summarise what is essential?
translate what does it mean?

Application
model demonstrate your understanding / skill
plan and deliver a presentation
what’s most important to your audience?

Analysis
Investigate what information do you need? where will you find it?
classify
categorise
compare and contrast

Evaluation
prioritise re-order with a justification
judge
recommend


Synthesis
create portfolio
compose write something ...
argue the case for
predict
imagine


Using “challenges”

Can you think of three reasons in 2 minutes for ...?
Use other numbers (3, 5, 7) (appeals to boys).
Pyramid – individuals think of one, share with pair, then pairs form fours and feedback to class.
Post-it – 2 mins to write 3 things on the post its. Then class file up and stick on board.

A Structure (for P4C type lesson)

1. choose text/ stimulus
2. pupils sit in circle
3. intro the idea of a philosophical question
4. remind of conventions
5. read text
6. pupils generate interesting questions
7. pupils choose one to discuss
8. discussion (begin with the one who came up with the question)
9. de-briefing

Learning Policy

Why do we need a learning policy?
What are schools for? What is learning? How do we (teachers and other school staff) help students to learn best? Why is it important to learn?
As teachers we enter a career-long conversation about these questions with each other, our students, their parents and the many other groups and individuals with whom we work. Whatever actual grades our students leave us with, we must preserve and nurture (or perhaps attempt to resuscitate) the innate curiosity and love of learning that all young children have.
This policy should be an evolving, living document that reflects and stimulates that conversation. It is being written after a series of staff meetings at which learning was the focus. It will be regularly reviewed. It will be of use only if it makes a positive, observable contribution to learning at Westwood (our own as well as the students’).

What is learning?
It is important to attempt to define learning. What is it that the students do that we wish to facilitate? Here are some starting points. Learning is:
students making meaning from their experiences
students making their own connections;
active, not just the passive absorption of information;
reflective – students need to review what, how and why they have learned.

Metaphor
Perhaps the best thing we can do to promote learning is to create metaphors or ways of describing learning which communicate our values clearly to all the groups with which we work. For example is learning “when the penny drops”? Do we think of it more as walking together, asking questions as we go? Or do we visualise it as a web of interconnections, mirroring the way the brain seems to work?

What do learners need?
Westwood is a successful school; our students are great learners. This list is offered as a stimulus for discussion, and to help us with our own processes of self-review. Students learn best when:
they are engaged, interested, stimulated;
there is challenge without stress;
they are encouraged to develop their own questions;
high self-esteem is encouraged;
they see that opportunities for choice are being given them, within the constraints imposed on us from above;
they understand what the lesson is about and its relevance;
they are able to link new skills, understanding and knowledge to their own experience;
there is lots of real dialogue and interaction (pupil-pupil as well as pupil-teacher);
there is an opportunity to demonstrate what they have learnt.

What are we doing well?
We are very good at this. We regularly review what works well for our students and why. We are willing to try new things, but rightly suspicious of one-size-fits-all quick-fixes. Another list: this time of features of teacher behaviour that we believe promote learning:
we act as resources, guides;
we facilitate learning, helping students make sense of their experiences in school;
we are coaches – helping students learn how to learn;
we share our own learning experiences – we model the skills and attitudes we promote;
we emphasise the importance of students listening to each other;
we encourage “the courage to fail” – aiming high and tolerating setbacks;
we know that intelligence is not fixed;
we are helping the students to explore the curriculum;
assessment is always part of the learning process, helping students to set targets and improve;
we successfully “sell” learning to students – helping them see its importance, relevance and pleasures.

Development
This conversation about learning has a profound impact on our planning for self and school development. Here are some of the things we are doing:
our own reflection;
observation – supportive, focused on student learning and for our own development;
teaching for effective learning on departmental meeting agendas;
planning (eg. at a dept. level) which enshrines our values in practical strategies that work for us;
research;
use of teacher learning networks;
inset;
work with student learning committee;
exploring coaching.

Next Steps
We need to reflect upon how we will know what difference our thinking on learning has made in practice. Some of the outcomes will be anecdotal, but some must be measurable.





Appendix: Useful Frameworks

Guy Claxton “Learning Power”

Claxton’s approach is to talk about the four “R” s that he sees as central to what he calls “learning power”. Here are the key terms and some idea about the skills within those areas:
Resilience – absorption, managing distractions, noticing, perseverance;
Resourcefulness – questioning, making links, imagining, reasoning, capitalising;
Reflectiveness – planning, revising, distilling, learning about learning;
Reciprocity – interdependence, collaboration, empathy, listening, imitation.

Also Guy Claxton says that great learners are: tenacious, logical, collaborative, resourceful, self-disciplined, inquisitive, imaginative and self-aware.

The usefulness of this work for us is again as a tool for reflection. Do we foster these skills and qualities? Do we give students the opportunity to develop them? Do we model them in the way we share our own learning experiences?


Alistair Smith “Learning Cycle”

Smith outlines a 4 stage cycle as follows:
1. context-setting – prior learning, objectives, hook / stimulus;
2. new information – demonstration, exposition, investigation, instruction;
3. making sense – pupils absorb and process information, demonstrate learning, assessment;
4. reflection – what learned, how, preview future learning.

Intellectual Behaviour (from Art Costa)

Intellectual Behaviour – Art Costa

1. Persistence
2. Decreasing Impulsivity
3. Listening to Others (with Understanding and Compassion)
4. Flexibility in Thinking
5. Metacognition (Awareness of our own Thinking)
6. Striving for Accuracy and Precision
7. Questioning and Problem Posing
8. Drawing on Past Knowledge and Experience
9. Ingenuity, Originality, Insightfulness: Creativity
10. Precision of Language and Thought
11. Gathering Data through all the Senses
12. Displaying a Sense of Humour
13. Wonderment, Inquisitiveness, and Curiosity
14. Cooperative Thinking and Social Intelligence

Learning Webs

Customised Learning and Peer-matched Learning Webs


Rationale


In a recent TES article on personalised or customised learning, Roland Meighan was described as “one of Britain’s leading authorities on alternative systems of education.” In his book The Next Learning System, he makes several interesting comments which inspired me to begin work on this topic.

Meighan is a supporter of home-schooling. He suggests that home-schooling offers several advantages over the current system. He argues that home-schoolers are “trail-blazers” who are showing what “the next learning system” will be like. Although it seems unlikely that our society will be de-schooled in the immediate future, Meighan’s radical approach is interesting.

One of the major strands in Meighan’s argument is the nature of modern society:


When schools were set up we lived in an information-poor society. Therefore getting children together in one place to give them access made some kind of sense. Now we live in an information-rich society it makes little or no sense.


Meighan believes that the internet and other media, as well as museums and other educational resources, mean that teachers and schools no longer hold a monopoly of information or skills. Ivan Illich in Deschooling Society had already identified this trend in 1971:


The proud dependence on school is gone. Consumer resistance increases in the knowledge industry. Many teachers and pupils, taxpayers and policemen, would prefer not to depend any longer on schools.


Students may feel that the information and skills which we teach can probably be learned elsewhere. They are also aware that there are many other skills and subjects in which they could educate themselves without the reliance on school. The emphasis on certification has led to the undervaluing of the content. It is the grade, not the actual learning that took place, that seems to matter to society. School can easily become a place that students are made to attend in order to be forcibly submitted to an arbitrary curriculum with the sole purpose gaining financial rewards (perhaps deferred until they have accumulated still more certificates).

Meighan’s critique of school as an institution is radical:


School, based on the current model of the compulsory day-detention centre, is itself a bully institution. […] The unwritten, but powerful message of this package, is that the adults get their way by bullying.


At this point most of us would claim that our school and our classrooms do not operate in this coercive manner. However, it is a recurrent theme in Illich’s work that school could not operate “unless it physically incarcerated the young during many successive years on sacred territory.”

Intrinsically motivated, independent learning happens elsewhere. Perhaps more disturbingly, we may actually be undermining that kind of learning. Meighan comments:


When they started school at five years of age, we know they were asking about thirty knowledge or enquiry questions an hour, but that this soon drops and eventually gets to around zero.


Illich is perhaps even more clear on this point:


All over the world the school has an anti-educational effect on society: school is recognised as the institution which specialises in education. The failures of school are taken by most people as proof that education is a very costly, very complex, always arcane and frequently almost impossible task.


Deschoolers argue that schools actually put people off learning. This is a problem if we want to get good learning to happen in schools and to promote life-long learning, rather than just to sell a competitive package of certification.

Meighan’s other important argument deals with learning styles:


Given the fact that we are able to locate over thirty differences in individual learning styles, any uniform approach to the curriculum or to learning is intellectual death to some, and often most of the learners. […] The situation in which one teacher faces thirty children in one room and is required to deliver the same material within a given period of time […] to all of them, means that drastic harm to the quality of learning of many of the class and the resultant loss of a great deal of potential learning is inevitable.


As teachers, we are trying to respond to recent research into learning styles. Meighan’s point is that the institution of school makes it very difficult to be as flexible as a home-school situation.

What is the alternative? Illich’s sees “teachers” or “pedagogues” as people who “help the student to find the path which for him could lead fastest to his goal.” Meighan’s research echoes Illich’s vision. Parents are:


learning site managers who help arrange the learning programme. They may also operate as learning coaches, or as fellow learners researching alongside their children, rather than as instructors.


Perhaps a more powerful model is embodied in Illich’s dictum: “creative, exploratory learning requires peers currently puzzled about the same terms or problems.” One of Illich’s most compelling ideas is the “learning web”. He speaks of “reticular structures” and computerised methods for putting people in touch with others who want to learn about the same area. His work predicts the development of the internet and suggests how it might be used to revolutionalise education and society.



The Task


In a modest way, I have attempted to design something that would help students to get in touch with peers who share their interests. The questionnaire would enable us to match students up. They would then be asked to do an extended research project. This would have a series of definite stages:


  1. Define what their aims are – what do they want to learn?

  2. Plan the approach – what resources to use, the outcome.

  3. Thorough research on the WWW, with books and any other materials.

  4. A detailed record of materials used to be produced.

  5. Mind-maps to be created on key resources / topics.

  6. A detailed review of one or more web-sites.

  7. Presentations to be made – either within the group, to one other group or to a larger audience. This ought to make use of visual aids.

  8. The writing of an informative piece on the topic.

  9. The writing of a journal or log of the whole project.

  10. The writing of a piece of creative writing that draws on the research in the same way that a professional author might (eg a murder story set in a biodome).

  11. The collection of materials into a pack, as a record and monument to the work involved.


Given the nature of school organisation this may have to be done within one class – although it could quite easily be widened to the half-year blocks who are doing English simultaneously. The teacher’s role in the lessons would be that of facilitator, although some “learning skills” (specifically mind-mapping and research skills) might need to be “taught”.

I have deliberately tried to connect the work to the English GCSE syllabus.

  • The initial planning discussions could be assessed as Speaking and Listening coursework (group work).

  • Item 6 could form the Media Coursework piece.

  • Item 7 could be assessed for individual contribution S/L coursework.

  • Items 9 and 10 could be entered as Original Writing coursework.

  • Item 8 provides practise for the type of writing task found on English GCSE examination papers.


These eleven elements would require an extended time-scale and access to a range of resources. My hope is that it could combine tasks which will help students to gain useful grades at GCSE English with a style of learning that is highly motivating and pupil-centred.

What is Learning

[a few notes I put together a few years back. The bit on "Reading Trajectories" might be of interest].

1. Guy Claxton – Building Learning Power


Claxton uses these key words to characterise great learners:

tenacious logical collaborative

resourceful self-disciplined inquisitive

imaginative self-aware

I have these words on large “incidental learning” boards in my classroom.


TASK:

Look up, discuss and write down the meaning of the words and how they apply to learning.

Each student should think of a time s/he demonstrated each quality in his or her learning.

The whole thing could be recorded in the form of a mind-map.


Further Discussion:

As we found in our TALC session, people disagree with some of the words (eg. “logical”). This diversity of opinions should open up a fruitful debate in which students suggest other qualities they feel are part of great learning.


I have always been inspired by John Holt’s definition of intelligence, which has much in common with what Claxton is saying. I feel it may be very motivating to share this with students as part of this task. In the original, Holt uses a generic “he”. I’ve altered this to “she” just to be provocative!


The intelligent person, young or old, meeting a new situation or problem, opens herself up to it; she tries to take in with mind and senses everything she can about it; she thinks about it instead of about herself or what it might cause to happen to her; she grapples with it boldly, imaginatively, resourcefully, and if not confidently, at least hopefully; if she fails to master it, she looks without shame or fear at her mistakes and learns what she can from them. This is intelligence. Clearly its roots lie in a certain feeling about life, and one’s self with respect to life. Just as clearly, unintelligence is not what most psychologists seem to suppose, the same thing as intelligence only less of it. It is an entirely different style of behaviour, arising out of an entirely different set of attitudes.

John Holt: How Children Fail


2. Flow


Flow is a state of absorption, or being in “the zone”: when one is concentrated to the extent that all distractions fade away and the activity feels effortless and enjoyable. Daniel Goleman writes on flow in Emotional Intelligence:


Being able to enter flow is emotional intelligence at its best; flow represents perhaps the ultimate in harnessing the emotions in the service of performance and learning. (p. 90)


Goleman goes on to explain that high-achieving teenagers experience flow for 40% of the time they spent studying, compared to just 17% for the low achievers. Low achievers also spent much less time studying at home (17 hours versus 27) – obviously because they don’t enjoy it. Goleman makes a link with Gardner’s work here; by getting students to learn in their preferred learning style we are more likely to help them enter flow.


It seems you have to be quite good at something to be able to get into flow while doing it. A. J. Marr, in an article called “In the Zone” (looking at Mihaly Csikzentmihalyi’s work on flow) says it’s found in “activities that perfectly matched one’s skills with the demands of performance”. Csikzentmihalyi suggests that you may be able to transform “potentially negative experiences” into flow by:


1) setting clear goals to strive toward, 2) becoming immersed in the activity chosen, 3) paying close attention to what is happening, and 4) learning to enjoy immediate experiences. (quoted in Marr article)


This group of instructions reminded me of simple meditation practices. Marr comments “pleasant emotional experiences that are characteristic of meditation have long been associated with strict attentiveness to specific stimuli […] and seen as a byproduct of that attentiveness.”


“Flow” seems identical to something called “access concentration” in the literature on meditation. This is a state in which “our thoughts and emotions […] start co-operating with our efforts to concentrate, instead of continually pulling us away from it” (Kamalashila, Meditation: the Buddhist Way of Tranquillity and Insight, p. 66). Kamalashila explains that the freedom from distractions means we have “more free energy available”. My own experience of mediation bears this out: it is possible to find oneself is a state of mind free from distraction with a very sharp focus on the object of meditation. This feels effortless and very enjoyable.


Simple meditation practices are basically just training in concentration. You attempt to keep the mind focussed on something (the breathing, for example) and keep coming back to it when you notice you are distracted. As Goleman puts it when describing flow more generally: “there seems to be a feedback loop at the gateway to this zone: it can require considerable effort to get calm and focused enough to begin the task.”


There are two problems here. Firstly, it is difficult to teach meditation in classroom setting. Secondly, there’s no guarantee that students will experience “access concentration”. However, it seems to me that an exploration of this area, perhaps through a practical exercise and a discussion of the links between learning, flow, meditation and concentration is useful. I attach a sheet which explains a fundamental meditation practice “the mindfulness of breathing”, along with the following extract from Simone Weil’s essay “Reflections on the Right Use of School Studies with a View to the Love of God”:


Although people seem to be unaware of it today, the development of the faculty of attention forms the real object and almost the sole interest of studies. Most school tasks have a certain intrinsic interest as well, but such an interest is secondary. All tasks which really call upon the power of attention are interesting for the same reason and to an almost equal degree.

[…] Never in any case whatever is a genuine effort of the attention wasted. It always has its effect on the spiritual plane and in consequence on the lower one of the intelligence, for all spiritual light lightens the mind.

If we concentrate our attention on trying to solve a problem of geometry, and if at the end of an hour we are no nearer to doing so than at the beginning, we have nevertheless been making progress each minute of that hour in a more mysterious dimension. Without our knowing or feeling it, this apparently barren effort has brought more light into the soul. The result will one day be discovered in prayer.


Whatever our opinions about the spiritual life, Weil’s point that time spent struggling to learn and concentrate is never wasted seems very pertinent. Learning can be difficult; experiencing difficulty does not mean we are failing.


Other approaches to flow: NLP

Look at the extract from Aldous Huxley’s novel Island (1962). This is interesting for several reasons. Firstly, Huxley had arrived at a theory of “multiple intelligences” many years before the research of Gardner etc. He was convinced that “everybody’s different from everybody else” (231) and that education must be personalised to suit the individual. I think that the section on “deep trance” and the distortion of time relates to “flow”. In this state we do have a different sense of time and experience “short-cuts to calculating and thinking and problem-solving”.


I don’t think hypnotism is necessary; perhaps we should be looking at NLP and ways of being able to get into flow through “anchoring” these powerful states. Anchoring is basically the deliberate creation of “triggers” for desired physiological states. Just as a smell or piece of music can trigger us to re-experience a particular emotion, NLP teaches us how to access a desired state (such as flow) by creating an anchor that we can use whenever we need to. I attach an explanation of how to create anchors from Introducing NLP by J. O’Connor and J. Seymour (p. 56ff).


TASK:

Discussion of flow. When do students experience it?

Would it be practical to lead students through the process of anchoring a particularly positive learning state?



3. Negative Capability


Again this is something Guy Claxton talks about. It is clearly related to some of his key words (eg. resilience). Keats came up with the term when thinking about Shakespeare. For him, it was an essential aspect of creativity.


At once it struck me, what quality went to form a Man of Achievement, especially in Literature, & which Shakespeare possessed so enormously-- I mean Negative Capability, that is when man is capable of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason. John Keats


Obviously, we need to nurture this kind of creative uncertainty. This concept is associated in my mind with Coleridge’s comments on “composing” which he also connects with memory and “thinking” in general.


Now let a man watch his mind while he is composing; or, to take a still more common case, while he is trying to recollect a name; and he will find the process completely analogous. Most of my readers will have observed a small water-insect on the surface of rivulets which throws a cinque-spotted shadow fringed with prismatic colours on the sunny bottom of the brook; and will have noticed how the little animal wins its way up against the stream, by alternate pulses of active and passive motion, now resisting the current, and now yielding to it in order to gather strength and a momentary fulcrum for a further propulsion. This is no unapt emblem of the mind’s self-experience in the act of thinking. Samuel Taylor Coleridge


Some students fear allowing their cognitive “water-insect” to be borne backwards by the current; we need to help them to see that it is part of the creative thinking process.


TASK:

Discussion of these statements with students. When do they feel creative? Does their experience fit with these statements?



4. Making Connections – Reading (Learning?) Trajectories


Being able to make links between different areas of knowledge or expertise is an essential aspect of learning. For me this manifests itself mainly through the patterns I see (or deliberately create) in my reading. There is often a link between the book I am currently reading and something I have previously read. This “trajectory” also extends beyond the current book to something I will read in the future. On the simplest level I may be reading a book by an author I’ve read before and whose other books I intend to read. Such simple “trajectories” also include reading within a particular genre or subject area. But the patterns we create in our reading can be more complex and interesting.


For example: I recently read the travel book Chasing Che (Patrick Symmes). In this book he visits Pumalin Park – a wilderness reserve set up by a radical environmentalist. This fired my interest and I am now reading Deep Ecology (Bill Devall and George Sessions); this was a book that inspired the founder of Pumalin Park (I found this out on the Pumalin website). In the course of reading about ecology I heard about a novel A Friend of the Earth by T.C. Boyle (I’ve read one of his before) which is about an aging radical environmentalist. The web of interconnections goes further. Deep Ecology mentions the poems of Robinson Jeffers, someone I already liked; reading the book has led me to read more of his work. My interest in radical groups has lead me to find out about Earth First! and to get a journal called Do or Die! which features articles about EF! and other groups. I also want to read some of the writings of Rachel Carson, whose Silent Spring was very influential in the early days of the environmental movement. All of this also reminded me of some of the poetry of Gerard Manley Hopkins, especially “Binsey Poplars”, which (perhaps surprisingly) has much in common with the perspective of Earth First!ers. This strand in my learning was greatly encouraged by my visit to The Eden Project in the summer. It’s linked in my mind with other important (for me) cultural objects such as the film Silent Running and the song “Woodstock”.


I’ve tried to represent this more visually on a mind-map. Clearly, the connections ramify on and on.


TASK:

Ask students to trace simple or complex “trajectories” within their reading. They should present these to the group. Students should cite a very wide range of “texts” when tracing their independent learning: web sites; TV programmes; computer games; films; popular music; magazines; books; conversations.



5. Share your own Learning


This is something Guy Claxton talks about a lot. I try to incorporate aspects of it into my teaching – for example sharing my original writing with students to show them that I am also struggling to produce effective pieces of writing for a range of audiences and purposes. I have also tried displaying my “drafts” in class – showing how a piece emerges from rough notes with lots of crossings out and so on.



6. Learning Webs


Ivan Illich said: “Creative, exploratory learning requires peers currently puzzled about the same terms or problems.” I attach a short text (“Customised Learning and Peer-matched Learning Webs”) which looks at the ideas of Ivan Illich and other radical educational thinkers. I think some parts of Tomlinson are very much in tune with this line of thinking; we need to think of ways in which we can create “learning webs” within school.


Thursday 27 October 2011

The Extended Learner

In his review of Andy Clark’s Natural-Born Cyborgs, Leslie Marsh summarises Clark as follows:


  1. The human mind is naturally disposed to develop and incorporate tools.

  2. Humans have always been to a greater or lesser degree cyborgs.


The highly-charged word “cyborg” is here used in a positive way. Mind is not confined within the skull; cognition is an actively-coupled system in which mind and environment interact: “a coalition with the artefactual” (Leslie).

In the seminal article “The Extended Mind”, Clark and Chalmers use several examples to demonstrate their premise. For instance, when playing Scrabble we often re-arrange the tiles in order to help us to think of possible words we could play. Clark and Chalmers see this as an “extended cognitive process”. Moving the tiles around is part of the thinking process.

Clark and Chalmers suggest that “the biological brain has in fact evolved and matured in ways which factor in the reliable presence of a manipulable external environment”. If we accept this, then the rise of portable computing and the ubiquity of the internet is not to be resisted or feared. It should be welcomed as the next stage in the evolution of human intelligence.

Carl Zimmer’s article “How Google is Making us Smarter” re-states these ideas in a nicely radical way: “The mind appears to be adapted for reaching out and making the world, including our machines, an extension of itself.” Or, more simply: “We all have minds that extend out into our environments”.

It’s important to stress that the mind is not just using the environment as a source of information. Zimmer uses the analogy of when we poke down a hole with a stick – our awareness is transferred to the end of the stick, it doesn’t stay fixed in our hands. When we use our extended minds we are creating feedback systems. Research has shown that when you teach monkeys to use a rake, it changes the behaviour of the neurons in the brain. Our minds are always eagerly searching for things with which to create these feedback loops. As Zimmer puts it, the human mind is: “constantly seeking to extend itself, to grab on to new tools it has never experienced before and merge with them”.

Some people seem to fear that new technologies are damaging our cognitive abilities. Zimmer points out that Socrates, “worried that writing would make people forgetful and unwise”. True, few people nowadays memorise whole epic poems, but surely the advantages that writing has given to human beings outweigh any such concerns.

Writing in 1998, Clark and Chalmers were hesitant to include the internet in the “extended mind”: “The Internet is likely to fail on multiple counts, unless I am unusually computer-reliant, facile with the technology and trusting”. I would argue that, by the standards of 1998, we are all, today, “unusually computer-reliant”. We, and even more so our students, are “facile with the technology”. As for the issue of reliability, this need not be a serious objection. Of course, students need to be able to judge the reliability of information gleaned from the internet, but this is a simple matter of teaching some research-skills. We cannot allow neo-Luddite wiki-haters to throw the baby out with the bath-water.

The Social Dimension

Clark and Chalmers posed another fascinating question: “What about socially extended cognition? Could my mental states be partly constituted by the states of other thinkers?” It barely needs pointing out that we are able to connect with each other far more than ever before: texting, Facebook, Twitter and other social applications allow us to constantly think together with others in a way that has never been possible at any point in human history. Marsh talks about “a kind of automatic pooling of knowledge and expertise”. It is no doubt the case that our students are rarely using these tools to help them explore the school curriculum. The challenge for us is to encourage students to use these things in a way that will enhance their (school-based) learning.

In 1973, Ivan Illich proposed the idea of “learning webs”: “The most radical alternative to school would be a network or service which gave each man the same opportunity to share his current concern with others motivated by the same concern”. The internet and mobile computing now make this type of learning possible in a way that is truly revolutionary.

Our students are already using their electronically extended minds with an ease and flexibility that ought to astonish us. We need to rise to the challenge.

Andy Clark and David J. Chalmers - “The Extended Mind” (1998).

http://consc.net/papers/extended.html

Ivan Illich - Deschooling Society (1973).

Leslie Marsh - “Review of Natural-Born Cyborgs” (2005).

http://vidiowiki.com/media/paper/09pEekA5pgo8%20Clark.pdf

Carl Zimmer - “How Google is Making us Smarter” (2009).

http://discovermagazine.com/2009/feb/15-how-google-is-making-us-smarter